United States v. Rudy Arambula

990 F.2d 1261 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rudy ARAMBULA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50396. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 6, 1993. Decided April 16, 1993. 1 Before HALL, WIGGINS and TROTT, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM * OVERVIEW 3 Rudy Arambula challenges the district court's denial of his motion to compel the government to recommend a reduction in his sentence. The district court concluded that the government was under no obligation to bring a motion further to reduce Arambula's sentence under the plea agreement. We affirm. FACTS 4 Arambula pleaded guilty to one count of possession of a prohibited chemical substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (d)(2), 802(33), and 802(34)(C). He entered his plea pursuant to a plea agreement with the government. In exchange for Arambula's plea and his compliance with the agreement, the government agreed to bring no…