United States v. George Steven Bustamante, Aka: George S. Bustamonte, Jr.

990 F.2d 1261 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George Steven BUSTAMANTE, aka: George S. Bustamonte, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50302. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 3, 1992. Decided April 2, 1993. Before D.W. NELSON, HALL and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellant George Bustamante appeals his conviction for bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2133 (a). He contends that the district court erred in denying his motions to suppress evidence and to disallow an impermissibly suggestive in-court identification. Bustamante also appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines on the ground that a prior 1973 conviction should not have been considered in deciding whether he was a career offender. For the reasons stated below, we affirm both Bustamante's conviction and his sentence. FACTS 3 On June 15, 1990, the Security Pacific Bank in Venice,…