United States v. Herman Floyd Dixon

990 F.2d 1261 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Herman Floyd DIXON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30055. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 10, 1993. * Decided March 17, 1993. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and FARRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM ** Herman Floyd Dixon appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines following his conviction by bench trial before a magistrate of conspiracy to commit theft and theft of property within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. An appeal of right from a criminal conviction imposed by a magistrate judge lies in the district court and must be brought in the district court before prosecution in the court of appeals. 18 U.S.C. § 3402 ; United States v. Soolook, Nos. 92-30488, 92-30489, 92-30501, 92-30510, slip op. 1489, 1492 (9th Cir. Feb. 19,…