United States v. Vernon A. Bunch

990 F.2d 1261 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vernon A. BUNCH, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10587. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 7, 1993. * Decided April 16, 1993. Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Vernon A. Bunch, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 habeas petition. Bunch contends that the district court erred in calculating his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and review the denial de novo. Tripati v. Henman, 843 F.2d 1160, 1162 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982 (1988). We affirm. 3 A defendant who does not timely object to the contents of his presentence report which is used to calculate his sentence waives his right to challenge whether his sentence was correctly calculated under the Guidelines in a section 2255 motion.…