United States v. David Lee Alexander

990 F.2d 1261 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Lee ALEXANDER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-15366. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 10, 1993. * Decided March 15, 1993. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and FARRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 David Lee Alexander, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence imposed after his guilty plea to bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a). Alexander contends that the district court erred by refusing to order that his federal sentence run concurrently with his earlier-imposed state sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . We review de novo, Doganiere v. United States, 914 F.2d 165, 167 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 1398 (1991), and affirm. 3 On February 1, 1982, the district court sentenced…