United States v. Alfred D. Arellanes

990 F.2d 1261 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfred D. ARELLANES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30375. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 10, 1993. * Decided March 15, 1993. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and FARRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Alfred D. Arellanes appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion asking the district court to preside over his special parole violation hearing. Arellanes contends that the district court, and not the United States Parole Commission (Commission), should decide whether to revoke his special parole term. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 The Commission retains jurisdiction over a special parolee until the maximum term for which the parolee was sentenced expires. McQuerry v. United States Parole Com'n, 961 F.2d 842, 845 (9th Cir.1992); see also 21 U.S.C. § 841 (c); 18 U.S.C.…