United States v. Julieo Alberto-Gutierrez

Good Law
990 F.2d 1261·1993 WL 102588·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 14183
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 7, 199391-50184California226 words

Opinion

Opinion

990 F.2d 1261 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julieo ALBERTO-GUTIERREZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50184. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 23, 1993. Decided April 7, 1993. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and FARRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Julieo Alberto-Gutierrez appeals his conviction and sentence imposed following entry of a guilty plea to transportation of illegal aliens in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1324 (a)(1)(B). 3 Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Alberto-Gutierrez's counsel filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review. Counsel also filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issues for review. 4 The motion of counsel to withdraw is GRANTED and the judgment is AFFIRMED. * The panel unanimously finds…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.