Samuel J. Tuccio v. Snohomish County Anthony C. Harvey D.M. Munday, and John and Jane Does 1-6

990 F.2d 1261 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Samuel J. TUCCIO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SNOHOMISH COUNTY; Anthony C. Harvey; D.M. Munday, and John and Jane Does 1-6, et al. Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-35843. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 9, 1993. * Decided April 12, 1993. Before WRIGHT, THOMPSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Samuel J. Tuccio appeals the district court's order dismissing his action against the State of Washington. Tuccio seeks a declaration that a Washington statute governing the procedure for detaining mentally disordered persons violates the Constitution. See Wash.Rev.Code § 71.05.150 (1992). We dismiss this appeal because Tuccio lacks standing to pursue his claim. 3 Tuccio filed a complaint against Snohomish County and various individual defendants seeking damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . He contended that he had been wrongfully detained by the defendants under color of…