United States v. Randall C. Hauser, United States of America v. Randall C. Hauser

990 F.2d 1262 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randall C. HAUSER, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Randall C. HAUSER, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 91-30288, 91-30317. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 4, 1992. Decided March 22, 1993. Before EUGENE A. WRIGHT, HUG and POOLE, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Randall Hauser appeals his conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and attempted possession with intent to distribute 5000 grams of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1)(A). Hauser argues for reversal on the grounds of outrageous government conduct in securing his indictment, entrapment as a matter of law, and various evidentiary errors during trial. The United States cross appeals Hauser's sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines, arguing that the district court improperly departed…