United States v. Craig Curtis Harris

990 F.2d 1262 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Craig Curtis HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50232. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 2, 1993. Decided March 23, 1993. Before SCHROEDER, DAVID R. THOMPSON and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Craig Curtis Harris appeals the 24-month sentence imposed after his guilty pleas to one count of producing counterfeit access devices in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029 (a)(1), and one count of possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029 (a)(3). 3 The first count included Harris' activities on August 26, 1991. On that date a confidential informant supplied him with six blank credit cards and names and account numbers. Harris later returned the cards, which were embossed with the new identifications, and received $2,400. The second count included the events of…