United States v. Richard Scott Hansen

990 F.2d 1262 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Scott HANSEN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50600. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 7, 1993. * Decided April 14, 1993. Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Richard Scott Hansen appeals his sentence imposed following entry of a guilty plea to embezzlement of savings and loan funds by a savings and loan employee in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 657 . Hansen contends that the district court erred by enhancing his base offense level for abuse of trust pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.3 because his conduct only suggested a "breach of trust." We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's application of the Sentencing Guidelines and for clear error the district court's factual findings made during the course of applying the Guidelines. United…