United States v. James C. Gravley

Good Law
990 F.2d 1262·1993 WL 98829·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 14147
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 2, 199392-36751California395 words

Opinion

Opinion

990 F.2d 1262 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James C. GRAVLEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-36751. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 23, 1993. * Decided April 2, 1993. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and FARRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 James C. Gravley, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. In case no. CR-91-60117, Gravely pleaded guilty to structuring a currency transaction to evade reporting requirements, in violation of 31 U.S.C. § 5324 . In case no. CR-91-60155, he pleaded guilty to mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 . After a sentencing hearing on November 13, 1991, he received concurrent sentences of 28 and 46 months imprisonment. Gravley contends that (1) the government breached the plea agreement by failing to make certain sentencing recommendations; (2) the district court improperly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.