United States v. Jerry Lynn Dry

Good Law
990 F.2d 1262·1993 WL 77230·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 14130
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 199392-30287California475 words

Opinion

Opinion

990 F.2d 1262 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerry Lynn DRY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30287. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 10, 1993. * March 18, 1993. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and FARRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jerry Lynn Dry appeals his conviction imposed upon entry of a guilty plea to kidnapping in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1201 (a)(1). Dry contends that the district court erred by failing to explain the nature and effect of a term of supervised release at his change of plea hearing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. 3 A party must " 'raise all claims of error in a single appeal following final judgment on the merits.' " United States v. Shah, 878 F.2d 272, 273 (9th Cir.1989) (quoting Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Risjord, 449 U.S. 368, 374 (1981)). Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a) allows a district court on remand of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.