United States v. Marcus Arthur Fontaine, AKA Bob Mato, Robert McConihay Mike Furlong, Robert Matoni, John Grossman

990 F.2d 1262 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcus Arthur FONTAINE, aka Bob Mato, Robert McConihay, Mike Furlong, Robert Matoni, John Grossman, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50155. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 4, 1993. Decided March 19, 1993. 1 Before HUG and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges, and SEDWICK, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Fontaine appeals his jury convictions for mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 and money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (a)(1). Fontaine contends that the district judge committed reversible errors in failing to ask a question of the jury on voir dire examination and in making improper evidentiary rulings. Fontaine also maintains that the Government committed prosecutorial misconduct and Brady violations, and that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to convict him of certain mail fraud and…