Marvich

990 F.2d 1263 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael P. MARVICH, Claimant-Appellant. Real Property Located at 2695 Canary Drive, Costa Mesa, California, Defendant. No. 91-56448. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 9, 1993. * Decided April 13, 1993. Before HALL, WIGGINS and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Claimant Michael Marvich appeals the district court's judgment of civil forfeiture pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881 (a)(7) in favor of the United States. The district court found that the defendant real property, Marvich's home, was used, or intended to be used, to facilitate the transportation, sale, receipt, possession or concealment of controlled substances in violation of Title 21 U.S.C., subchapter I, and that Marvich knew of such use. 3 The district court's judgment followed a non-jury trial at which direct testimony was taken by witness declarations, and at which…