United States v. Raul Lopez-Alvarez, United States of America v. Fabian Jimenez-Martinez

Good Law
990 F.2d 1263·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 13945
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 199388-5435California744 words

Opinion

Opinion

990 F.2d 1263 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raul LOPEZ-ALVAREZ, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fabian JIMENEZ-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 88-5435, 88-5441. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 1, 1993. Decided March 18, 1993. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, HUG and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Lopez-Alvarez and Jimenez-Martinez appeal their convictions for conspiracy to kidnap and murder a United States Customs Service Agent and foreign travel with intent to commit a murder for hire. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 1117 , 1201(c), 1952(a). 3 A. Both defendants argue the district court erred in denying their motion to dismiss the indictment for outrageous government conduct. Because the defendants argued the indictments should be dismissed as a matter of due process as well as under the court's supervisory power, we review…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.