United States v. Darrell King, United States of America v. Timothy Leon Martin

990 F.2d 1263 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darrell KING, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timothy Leon MARTIN, Defendant-Appellant Nos. 92-50312, 92-50344. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 3, 1993. * Decided April 1, 1993. Before SCHROEDER, THOMPSON and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Darrell King and Timothy Martin appeal their convictions for armed bank robbery on the grounds that the district court erred by denying their motion to suppress certain evidence. We affirm. 3 Late one morning a Wells Fargo Bank was robbed. Bank employees immediately called the police and described the robber. The bank teller stated that the robber was a black male wearing a black turtleneck, black jeans, and white tennis shoes. The teller described the robber as in his early 20's, as approximately 5'7" and 170 pounds, and appearing to have a…