United States v. Reginald Sydney Jones

Good Law
990 F.2d 1263·1993 WL 78076·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 13940
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 19, 199392-10258California628 words

Opinion

Opinion

990 F.2d 1263 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Reginald Sydney JONES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10258. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 8, 1993. Decided March 19, 1993. Before GOODWIN, NOONAN and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Reginald Jones appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines following his guilty plea to bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a). The district court found that there was no basis for downward departure from the guideline range and sentenced Jones to the minimum term of 168 months. We affirm. 3 The Pre-Sentence Report calculated Jones' Base Offense Level to be thirty-two with a Criminal History Category VI resulting in a sentencing range of 168-210 months. The probation officer, however, recommended that the court depart downward from the guideline range and impose a sentence of forty-one months, because of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.