United States v. Hipolito Milan-Contreras

Good Law
990 F.2d 1263·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 13952
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 6, 199392-30273California823 words

Opinion

Opinion

990 F.2d 1263 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hipolito MILAN-CONTRERAS, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-30273, 92-30279. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 23, 1993. * Decided April 6, 1993. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and FARRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Hipolito Milan-Contreras appeals his sentence imposed following revocation of his supervised release and entry of a guilty plea to illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . In a consolidated sentencing hearing, the district court sentenced Milan-Contreras to consecutive terms of 24 months' imprisonment for violation of his supervised release and 27 months' imprisonment for the illegal reentry. This sentence was ordered to run consecutive to a 12-month sentence imposed for a state drug offense which was also a basis for the revocation of the supervised release. Milan-Contreras…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.