United States v. Donald Allen Miller
Opinion
Opinion
990 F.2d 1263 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald Allen MILLER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30328. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 23, 1993. * Decided April 6, 1993. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and FARRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Donald Allen Miller appeals his sentence of 210 months, imposed under the United States Sentencing Guidelines, following his guilty plea to conspiracy to manufacture and possess with the intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) and 846. Miller claims the district court erred by failing to grant him a downward adjustment pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 for being a minor or minimal participant in the offense. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review for clear error a district court's finding of a defendant's role in an offense. United States v.…