United States v. Eric A. Hernandez-Pellot, United States of America v. Rafael Montoya-Verdugo, United States of America v. Refino Armenta Sandoval, United States of America v. Juan Garza Ojeda

990 F.2d 1263 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eric A. HERNANDEZ-PELLOT, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rafael MONTOYA-VERDUGO, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Refino Armenta SANDOVAL, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Garza OJEDA, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-10532, 91-10536 to 91-10538. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 14, 1992. Decided March 25, 1993. Before: NORRIS, BEEZER, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Juan Ojeda, Refino Sandoval and Rafael Montoya-Verdugo appeal their convictions for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1), 846. Eric Hernandez-Pellot appeals his conviction for contempt, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 401 , and his sentences for that offense and…