United States v. John Hunt, AKA Ian Hahn

990 F.2d 1263 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John HUNT, aka Ian Hahn, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10023. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 23, 1993. * Decided April 6, 1993. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and FARRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John Hunt appeals the district court's revocation of his probation. Hunt was convicted, following a guilty plea, for interstate transportation of money taken by fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2314 . Hunt argues that the district court erred by revoking his probation because (1) his failure to pay restitution as required by the conditions of his probation was not willful, (2) his probation was revoked under circumstances inherently misleading to him, and (3) he was denied his due process right to confrontation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 3 We review for abuse of discretion the…