United States v. Vincent George Parks, Jr.

990 F.2d 1264 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vincent George PARKS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-55997. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 10, 1993. * Decided March 16, 1993. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and FARRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Vincent Parks, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging his jury conviction for armed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113 (a) & (d), and use of a firearm during a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c). We review de novo, Vargas v. United States Parole Commission, 865 F.2d 191, 193 (9th Cir.1988), and we affirm. 3 Parks contends that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction for use of a firearm during a crime of violence because the government failed to prove that he possessed a…