United States v. Louie J. Montellano

Good Law
990 F.2d 1264·1993 WL 83839·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 13917
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 24, 199391-50550California1,994 words

Opinion

Opinion

990 F.2d 1264 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louie J. MONTELLANO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50550. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 5, 1993. * Decided March 24, 1993. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and SNEED and CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant Montellano challenges his bank robbery convictions claiming two convictions were based on photos taken after an unjustified Terry stop and that all convictions were supported by insufficient evidence. Montellano also contends the district court improperly denied a two level reduction for acceptance of responsibility under the Sentencing Guidelines. We affirm the district court in all respects. I. FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS 3 On November 26, 1990, a man walked into the First Interstate Bank in Santa Fe Springs, California, placed a newspaper on the counter, and commanded the teller to put cash onto it. He…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.