United States v. Edward Pisciotta

990 F.2d 1264 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward PISCIOTTA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50284. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 23, 1993. * Decided April 7, 1993. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and FARRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Edward Pisciotta appeals his 185-month sentence after his guilty pleas to bank robbery with a dangerous weapon and use of a firearm in a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113 (a), (d), 924(c). Pisciotta contends that the district erred by: (1) including in his criminal history score a 1980 state burglary conviction which resulted from an invalid guilty plea; and (2) refusing to order that his federal sentence run concurrently with an undischarged state sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 1. Prior Conviction 3 Pisciotta contends that the district court erred by…