United States v. Larry F. Perrin

990 F.2d 1264 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry F. PERRIN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-30005. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 29, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington; No. CR-89-00016-JET, Jack E. Tanner, District Judge, Presiding. Before WRIGHT, FLETCHER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Larry Perrin was convicted after a jury trial of conspiring to manufacture more than 100 marijuana plants in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and of the substantive offense, a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 . He appeals his conviction and sentence. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY 3 In March 1987, Perrin and James Varner were arrested in connection with a marijuana cultivation facility they had operated in Oregon. The two agreed to set up a similar venture somewhere else, and selected a site in Camas, Washington. 4 By January 1988,…