United States v. David Rios, United States of America v. Erasmo Rios-Villa, United States of America v. Pedro Camacho Garcia

990 F.2d 1264 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David RIOS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Erasmo RIOS-VILLA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pedro Camacho GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-10276, 92-10263 and 92-10272. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 3, 1993. * Decided March 16, 1993. Before: FARRIS, POOLE and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Codefendants David Rios, Erasmo Rios-Villa, and Pedro Camacho Garcia appeal their convictions for: (1) conspiracy, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 ; (2) distribution and possession with intent to distribute heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 ; and (3) interstate travel in aid of racketeering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1952 (a)(3). In addition, Rios appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines.…