United States v. Justino C. Robles

990 F.2d 1264 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Justino C. ROBLES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50175. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 7, 1993. * Decided April 14, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; No. CR-89-598-01-JSR, John S. Rhoades, District Judge, Presiding. S.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Justino C. Robles appeals his convictions, following a jury trial, for conspiracy to possess heroin with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1), 846 and 18 U.S.C. § 2 . Robles contends that the district court erred by denying his motion for acquittal because he was entrapped as a matter of law. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 3 We review the sufficiency of evidence to determine whether, viewing the evidence in…