United States v. Antoine Dewayne Persley

990 F.2d 1264 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antoine Dewayne PERSLEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-50579. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 10, 1992. Decided March 18, 1993. Before POOLE, WIGGINS and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * I. 2 Appellant Antoine Dewayne Persley appeals his conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). Persley asserts that the law enforcement officers who stopped him at the Los Angeles International Airport had no reasonable suspicion upon which to justify his detention, and argues that he did not consent to a warrantless search of his luggage. By Order dated March 19, 1992, this court remanded the case for clarification of the district court's findings on whether Persley consented to the luggage search. In a Response to Order of Remand received January 13, 1993, the district…