United States v. Paul David Ruddy, United States of America v. Paul David Ruddy, United States of America v. Paul David Ruddy

990 F.2d 1265 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul David RUDDY, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul David RUDDY, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul David RUDDY, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-15767, 92-15796, 92-16449 and 92-16415. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1993. * Decided March 8, 1993. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Paul David Ruddy, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his four 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motions to vacate two concurrent 20 year sentences for two separate bank robbery convictions. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's denial of a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. United States v. Angelone, 894 F.2d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir.1990). We review the district…