United States v. Michael Edward Versey

990 F.2d 1265 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Edward VERSEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50801. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 10, 1993. * Decided March 18, 1993. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and FARRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Michael Edward Versey appeals his sentence imposed following entry of a guilty plea to five counts of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a). Versey contends that the government violated his plea agreement when it argued for an upward adjustment in his offense level under the Sentencing Guidelines for his use a knife during one of the charged robberies. He also contends that the district court (1) improperly relied on several uncharged robberies and his use of the knife to justify an upward departure from the applicable Guidelines sentencing range, and (2) failed to provide adequate reasons in support of the…