United States v. George Paul Salemo

Good Law
990 F.2d 1265·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 14075
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 25, 199392-10029California682 words

Opinion

Opinion

990 F.2d 1265 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George Paul SALEMO, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-10029, 92-15170. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 8, 1993. Decided March 25, 1993. 1 Before: PREGERSON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges, and TAKASUGI, District Judge. * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 In consolidated appeals, George Paul Salemo claims the district court erred in sentencing him to 176 months following his plea of guilty to two counts of wire fraud and three counts of using a false social security number. Because the district court failed to inform Salemo of the maximum sentence possible under Salemo's plea agreement as required by Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, we vacate the plea and remand for further proceedings. 4 * As an initial matter, we accept the corrected version of the transcript and deny defendant Salemo's Motion to Disallow Proposed Change in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.