Jesse D. Wallin, Sr. v. Indeterminate Sentence Review Board and the Department of Corrections for the State of Washington

Good Law
990 F.2d 1266·1993 WL 83503·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 13811
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 23, 199391-35167California647 words

Opinion

Opinion

990 F.2d 1266 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jesse D. WALLIN, Sr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. INDETERMINATE SENTENCE REVIEW BOARD; and the Department of Corrections for the State of Washington, Respondents-Appellees, No. 91-35167. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 5, 1993. Decided March 23, 1993. 1 Before CANBY and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges, and TASHIMA, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Wallin appeals the judgment denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus and the denial of his "motion to reconsider" that judgment. We affirm. I. The Judgment 4 Wallin did not timely appeal the district court judgment. Wallin filed his notice of appeal 79 days after the judgment was handed down by the district court. A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of the entry of judgment, although this period may be extended upon meritorious motion filed not later than 30 days after the expiration of the original 30 day time…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.