Paul A. Wright v. Abe Clark

990 F.2d 1266 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Paul A. WRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Abe CLARK, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-35033. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 7, 1993. * Decided April 16, 1993. Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Paul A. Wright, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's partial summary judgment in favor of defendant prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Wright contends that the district court erred by granting the prison officials qualified immunity. He claims that the defendants denied him due process and his first amendment rights by refusing to deliver incoming mail which did not contain his prison identification number. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 3 Title 28 U.S.C. § 1291 grants courts of appeals jurisdiction of appeals from all "final decisions of the district courts of the United States."…