United States v. Robert George White

Good Law
990 F.2d 1266
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 31, 199391-10394California1,256 words

Opinion

Opinion

990 F.2d 1266 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert George WHITE, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-10394, 91-10429, 91-10426 and 91-10428. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 14, 1992. Decided March 31, 1993. Before SCHROEDER, NORRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Robert George White appeals the district court's sentence following his guilty plea to eleven counts of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a). We vacate and remand for resentencing. 3 * Pursuant to a plea agreement, White pleaded guilty to eleven counts of unarmed bank robbery in four separate cases in district court. The district court calculated White's base offense level at 25 with a criminal history category of IV (for which the sentencing range is 84-105 months). However, the district court determined that White's criminal history category did not adequately represent the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.