Exxon Corporation v. Azad Amiri, Exxon Corporation v. Siroos Saifi

991 F.2d 803 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. EXXON CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Azad AMIRI, Defendant-Appellant. EXXON CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Siroos SAIFI, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-15987, 92-16006. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 7, 1993. * Decided April 15, 1993. Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Azad Amiri (No. 92-15987) and Siroos Saifi (No. 92-16006) (collectively "appellants") appeal the district court's orders (1) granting partial summary judgment for Exxon Corporation ("Exxon") on Exxon's claim seeking termination of Saifi's franchise under the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 2801 (1)-06 ("PMPA"); and (2) issuing a writ of possession and directing the eviction of Saifi from his former service station. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 3 The district court's partial summary judgment is not a final order and, therefore,…