Khairy Aref v. John Marder Theodore Polich Doug Purdy Morris, Polich & Purdy Hufstedler, Kaus & Ettinger Seth Hufstedler, Otto Kaus Warren Ettinger Patricia Phillips Pauline Levy James Natoli Edward Ash Lee Francis John Fee William Carroll Tiit Heinsoo International Court of Arbitration Nest, Brudin & Smith Norman Neste Raymond Stone County of Los Angeles Court of Appeals, Court of Appeals of the State of California State Bar of California Board of Governors of the State Bar of California

991 F.2d 803 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Khairy AREF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John MARDER; Theodore Polich; Doug Purdy; Morris, Polich & Purdy; Hufstedler, Kaus & Ettinger; Seth Hufstedler, Otto Kaus; Warren Ettinger; Patricia Phillips; Pauline Levy; James Natoli; Edward Ash; Lee Francis; John Fee; William Carroll; Tiit Heinsoo; International Court of Arbitration; Nest, Brudin & Smith; Norman Neste; Raymond Stone; County of Los Angeles; Court of Appeals, Court of Appeals of the State of California; State Bar of California; Board of Governors of the State Bar of California, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 92-55838, 92-55890. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 7, 1993. * Decided April 15, 1993. Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Khairy Aref appeals pro se the district court's Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) dismissal of his RICO and civil rights claims for failure to timely file a RICO statement.…