Jo Ann Rehfuss v. Associates Financial Services, Inc., a South Carolina Co.

991 F.2d 803 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jo Ann REHFUSS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ASSOCIATES FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., a South Carolina Co., Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-16065. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 7, 1993. * Decided April 15, 1993. Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jo Ann Rehfuss appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for Associates Financial Services, Inc. (Associates) in her diversity action for fraud, conspiracy, and wrongful foreclosure. She contends the district court erred by granting summary judgment for Associates pursuant to Arizona Local Rule 11(i). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 3 On March 30, 1992, Rehfuss filed her action against defendants Morrah P. Bradley, James R. Mann, and Associates in the district court of Arizona. On April 30, 1992, Associates moved for summary judgment, contending Rehfuss was barred from bringing this action…