Nwabueze C. Clement v. R. Crawford, Lt. Esmor Inc. L. Fauria, Lt.

Good Law
991 F.2d 803·1993 WL 118144
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 15, 199392-36708California1,334 words

Opinion

Opinion

991 F.2d 803 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Nwabueze C. CLEMENT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R. CRAWFORD, Lt.; Esmor Inc.; L. Fauria, Lt., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-36708. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 7, 1993. * Decided April 15, 1993. Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Nwabueze C. Clement, a detainee at the Immigration and Naturalization Service's detention center in Seattle, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment of his civil rights 1 action in favor of Esmor, Inc., the contract operator of the detention center and two Esmor employees. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 * Standard of Review 4 We review de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment. Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 (1990). Summary judgment is appropriate if the evidence, construed in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.