Damjanovic v. Ambrose

991 F.2d 803 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Antun DAMJANOVIC, Milagros Damjanovic, Klara Damjanovic, by and through her guardian ad litem, Antun Damjanovic, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Robert AMBROSE, Martha Dale England, Robert L. Ruegger, Stephen R. Dean, Sherman Block, and the County of Los Angeles, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-56070. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 3, 1993. Decided April 15, 1993. Before PREGERSON, LEAVY and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Plaintiffs-Appellants ("the Damjanovics") appeal the district court's orders (1) denying their motion to amend their Second Amended Complaint to add James Clark ("Clark") as a defendant; (2) dismissing, sua sponte, defendants County of Los Angeles and Sherman Block ("County Defendants"); and (3) granting the motion for summary judgment by defendants Robert Ambrose and Martha Dale England ("Accountant Defendants") and denying the Damjanovics' motion for…