Felburg, In re

991 F.2d 803 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Robert A. FELBURG; Norma Felburg, Debtors. Robert A. FELBURG, Appellant, v. STUTMAN, TREISTER & GLATT; Nossaman, Guthner, Knox & Elliott; Greenberg, Glusker, Fields, Claman & Machtinger; Robert Linsow; Steven G. Wolff; Pachulski, Stang and Ziehl, P.C., Appellees. No. 91-56205. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 7, 1993. * Decided April 15, 1993. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and O'SCANNLAIN and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 1 On March 9, 1993, we entered an order requesting the parties to address the issue of whether appellant Felburg has standing to bring this appeal. The appellees have responded and argue that the record does not indicate that Felburg has a pecuniary interest in the outcome of this appeal. Felburg has failed to respond to our order. 2 Standing is a necessary element of our jurisdiction, and we must satisfy ourselves that Felburg…