United States v. Ronald David Edwards, Aka: Ronald Edwards

991 F.2d 804 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ronald David EDWARDS, aka: Ronald Edwards, Defendant-Appellant No. 91-50843. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 6, 1993. * Decided April 15, 1993. Before FARRIS, NORRIS and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ronald David Edwards appeals his convictions for armed bank robbery and use of a firearm during the commission of a crime of violence. He argues that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions and that the district court erred in the supplemental jury instructions it gave in response to a jury inquiry. We affirm. 3 * We review the sufficiency of the evidence to support a criminal conviction by asking "whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt." Jackson v. Virginia,…