Stanley J. Trohimovich v. United States

991 F.2d 804 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Stanley J. TROHIMOVICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-35050. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 7, 1993. * Decided April 15, 1993. Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Stanley J. Trohimovich appeals pro se the district court's orders (1) dismissing his action pursuant to a permanent injunction entered in a previous action; and (2) denying his motion to vacate judgment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, see Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 (1990), and affirm. 3 On November 29, 1990, Trohimovich filed a complaint in district court alleging that officers or employees of the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") unlawfully seized nineteen motor vehicles from the Grays Harbor Motors Family Estate, a…