United States v. Bruce Loren Latimer

991 F.2d 804 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bruce Loren LATIMER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50420. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 17, 1992. Decided April 26, 1993. Before NORRIS, REINHARDT and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Bruce Loren Latimer was convicted and sentenced for armed robbery and for use of a firearm in a crime of violence. He claims that (1) the police lacked probable cause to arrest him, (2) the government violated the requirements of discovery, and (3) there were errors in his sentencing. With this memorandum disposition, we affirm his conviction and reject all but one of the challenges he makes to his sentence. 1 3 * Latimer claims probable cause was lacking to arrest him because testimony that Latimer's car had been tracked using the ETS system was unsupported by foundational evidence and because there was only hearsay testimony regarding…