United States v. Bruce Loren Latimer

Good Law
93 Daily Journal DAR 5200·991 F.2d 1509·1993 WL 127191·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 9098·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3045
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 26, 199391-50420California10,681 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Norris, J.

Appellant Bruce Latimer challenges his classification as a career offender under § 4B1.1 of the Sentencing Guidelines following his 1991 conviction for armed bank robbery and for use of a firearm during a crime of violence. 1 Because he was designated a career offender by the district court, Latimer was sentenced to a period of 26 years and 10 months in prison, followed by a 5-year term of supervised release. Of Latimer's nearly 27 years in prison, 15 of these years came solely as a result of his being classified as a career offender.

Whether Latimer is to be imprisoned an additional 15 years as a career offender turns, principally, on whether confinement in a community treatment center constitutes incarceration under the meaning of § 4A1.2(e)(1) of the Sentencing Guidelines. Because we hold that confinement in a community treatment center does not fall within the ambit of this provision, we reverse and remand for resentencing.

I

A defendant qualifies as a career offender if the present offense is a crime of violence and if the defendant has two prior convictions for crimes of violence. U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. A prior conviction may be counted only if the conviction resulted in the…

Dissenting Opinion

Trott, J.

dissenting:

I respectfully dissent. I do so because of the time Latimer spent in a federal penitentiary between June 4, 1979 and September 14, 1978 for five bank robberies, which in my calculation would put him in prison for those robberies within the relevant fifteen-year period. See U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(e). This *1518 would make Latimer, who has committed seven bank robberies in Utah, Colorado, Arizona, and California, eligible to be treated as a career offender.

I

Latimer began serving his 1967 sentence for five separate bank robberies on March 4, 1967, and was paroled on June 20, 1972. A parole violation warrant was issued on June 16, 1977 because Latimer committed another bank robbery in 1973, his sixth. A detainer was also issued because Latimer was then incarcerated for his 1973 bank robbery. On June 4, 1979, Latimer was paroled on the 1973 charges to the detain-er. Latimer was then held in custody on the parole violation warrant stemming from his 1967 sentence from June 4, 1979 to August 27, 1979 — the day of his parole revocation hearing. Latimer was finally placed in a community treatment center on September 14, 1979, where he stayed until December 19th, when he was…

Opinion

991 F.2d 1509 61 USLW 2706 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bruce Loren LATIMER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50420. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 17, 1992. Decided April 26, 1993. Carlton F. Gunn, Asst. Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, CA, for defendant-appellant. John J. Byrne, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before: NORRIS, REINHARDT, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. WILLIAM A. NORRIS, Circuit Judge: 1 Appellant Bruce Latimer challenges his classification as a career offender under § 4B1.1 of the Sentencing Guidelines following his 1991 conviction for armed bank robbery and for use of a firearm during a crime of violence. 1 Because he was designated a career offender by the district court, Latimer was sentenced to a period of 26 years and 10 months in prison, followed by a 5-year term of supervised release. Of Latimer's nearly 27 years in prison, 15 of these years came solely as a result of his being classified as a career offender. 2 Whether Latimer is to be imprisoned an additional 15 years as a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.