Auto Service, Inc. v. Shell Oil Company

Good Law
93 Daily Journal DAR 5412·992 F.2d 920·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 9932·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3137
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 30, 199391-35709California4,893 words

Opinion

Opinion

992 F.2d 920 DuFRESNE'S AUTO SERVICE, INC.; Bobby L. Chaney; Denman Bird; Gerald Cochran; Bruce Chapman; Doll's Service Co., Inc.; Robert Peck; Dwight Estby Enterprises, Inc.; Gordon Olson; Norris Olson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SHELL OIL COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-35709. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 2, 1993. Decided April 30, 1993. David S. Shannon, Shannon, Johnson & Bailey, Portland, OR, for plaintiffs-appellants. William N. Mehlhaf, Markowitz, Herbold, Glade & Mehlhaf, Portland, OR, for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. Before: TANG, POOLE and RYMER, Circuit Judges. RYMER, Circuit Judge: 1 A group of Shell-brand gasoline dealers in the Portland, Oregon area appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Shell Oil Company in an action under the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act (PMPA), 15 U.S.C. §§ 2801-2806 (1978). The dealers seek declaratory relief and damages for termination and nonrenewal without notice of their franchises and franchise relationships. These claims arise out of Shell's 1987 assignment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.