Scott C. Smith v. Carol Noonan James Blodgett

Good Law
93 Daily Journal DAR 5844·992 F.2d 987·1993 WL 145753·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10478·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3389
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 10, 199392-35343California808 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wright, J.

Scott C. Smith, an inmate in the Washington State Penitentiary, appeals from a district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. .§ 1983 civil rights action that alleged that he was denied due process when prison officials placed him in administrative segregation (ad-seg). The district court dismissed his action, holding that prison officials were entitled to qualified immunity. We AFFIRM on other grounds.

I

Prison officials placed Smith in ad-seg while investigating allegations that he threatened to assault an inmate and an officer. He filed, an action against Hearing Officer Carol Noonan and Superintendent James Blodgett, alleging a violation of a liberty interest to remain in the general prison population and deprivation of due process rights.

Smith moved for summary judgment and the State filed a cross-motion. The court granted the State’s motion, finding that Noo-nan and Blodgett were entitled to qualified immunity. In its order, the court assumed that the Washington Administrative Code [WAC] created a liberty interest for prisoners to remain in the general population. It recognized, however, that district courts were divided on this issue. Because the court lacked a “clearly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.