Miklos Csoka Laszlo v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

992 F.2d 1219 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Miklos Csoka LASZLO, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70083. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 27, 1993. * Decided April 30, 1993. Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Miklos Csoka Laszlo petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' (B.I.A.) order dismissing his appeal as untimely. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a), and we affirm. 3 Immigration and Naturalization Service regulations require that an appeal from the Immigration Judge's decision to the B.I.A. must be taken within 10 days. 8 C.F.R. § 242.21 . The time to file a notice of appeal is mandatory and jurisdictional. Hernandez-Rivera v. I.N.S., 630 F.2d 1352, 1354 (9th Cir.1980). The Immigration Judge rendered his decision on June 2, 1992. Petitioner filed his notice of appeal to the B.I.A. on December 29, 1992, well…