John Badea v. Gordon Yach, Joseph Evers, John Doe

Good Law
992 F.2d 1219·1993 WL 131219·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 16284
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 27, 199391-15545California360 words

Opinion

Opinion

992 F.2d 1219 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John BADEA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gordon YACH, Joseph Evers, John Doe, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-15545. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 2, 1992. * Decided April 27, 1993. Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John Badea, a federal prisoner, appeals from the district court's judgment in favor of prison medical officials after a bench trial on Badea's claim that the officials violated his Eighth Amendment rights by giving him improper dental care and threatening to have him placed in solitary confinement if he made further complaints about his dental condition. The trial was conducted pursuant to our remand in the earlier appeal, Badea v. Moran, No. 88-15511, filed January 22, 1990. 3 Appellant first contends that the district court erred in limiting the trial to a consideration of plaintiff's claim regarding the prison dentist, Dr. Bruce…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.