William McKinney v. J. Sanders

Good Law
992 F.2d 1219·1993 WL 142090·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 16300
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 5, 199392-15071California1,185 words

Opinion

Opinion

992 F.2d 1219 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. William MCKINNEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. SANDERS, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-15071. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 27, 1993. * Decided May 5, 1993. Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 William McKinney, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the denial of his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court's order dismissing his action for failure to comply with the court's orders. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm. 3 On August 28, 1990, McKinney filed a civil rights action against the defendant prison officials. On October 16, 1990, the defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. McKinney filed a motion in opposition to the summary judgment to which he attached various exhibits. The defendants filed a motion to strike the exhibits because McKinney did not provide the defendants with a copy…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.